|
|
 |
 |
|
Supplemental Social Security-Based Retirement Savings
Account: An Introduction
March 31, 2005
Supplemental Social Security-Based Retirement Savings
Accounts (RSAs):
The Institute for SocioEconomic Studies
has developed a supplemental Retirement Savings
Account (RSA) concept aimed at facilitating
the partial pre-funding of retirement as
soon as possible. Already, partial pre-funding
of retirement is undertaken in 20 countries
and for 80 million workers as part of their
national retirement system.[1]
In the United States,
opinion polls show sharp divisions concerning
the concept of allowing workers to transfer
a portion of their payroll taxes into personal
savings accounts[2] from which they would invest the funds. Nevertheless,
partial pre-funding is critical to ensuring
retirees sufficient income. “I believe
that, as the baby boom generation begins
to retire in a few years, it will become
increasingly important for the nation to
boost resources available in the future through
greater national saving and enhanced incentives
for participation in the labor force,” U.S.
Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan explained.[3]
Partial pre-funding would likely increase
national saving and beneficial capital formation.
CBO Director Douglas Holtz-Eakin told
the House Budget Committee, “Prefunding
retirement benefits has the potential to
increase the nation’s capital stock,
boost productivity, and raise GDP in the
long run.[4]
The Institute for SocioEconomic Studies
has devised a Retirement Savings Account
(RSA) concept that would operate as follows:
- Voluntary contributions would be in addition
to social security taxes.
- Contributions would supplement those
made in the form of payroll taxes.
- Each year, a person could contribute
an amount of up to 50% of the total payroll
tax attributable to his/her income.
- Contributions would be tax-deductible.
- RSA assets could be invested in broad-based
equity, bond, money market, commodity index,
and real estate investment trust portfolios
as the RSA account owner chooses.
- RSA investments grow tax free.
- Distributions commence at the time one
becomes eligible for Social Security.
- Distributions could be taken as a lump-sum
or as an annuity.
- Distributions would be taxed at half
one’s income tax rate for the year
in which such distributions are received,
as only half the distributions would be
included in one’s ordinary income.
- Tax revenue on distributions would be
directed to the Social Security Trust Fund.
Starting Retirement Pre-Funding Now is Advantageous:
Given the compounding of interest, the earlier
one begins to make contributions to one’s
RSA, the larger one’s accumulated assets
grow. Even relatively small contributions
would generate a fairly sizable portfolio
after 30-40 years.
Assuming annual investments of $1,000 made
in monthly installments of approximately
$83.33 and applying historic real rates of
return[5] on Treasury securities and equities, a portfolio comprised
of 50% Treasuries and 50% equities would
grow to $72,204 after 30 years. After 35
years, it would be almost 40% larger. After
40 years, it would be more than 90% larger
than the 30-year figure.
The Growth of Assets:
Investment
Term |
50%
Treasuries/50% Equities |
50%
Treasuries/50% Corporate Bonds |
30
Years |
$72,204 |
$50,756 |
35
Years |
$100,790 |
$65,157 |
40
Years |
$139,159 |
$82,114 |
More Assets = More Retirement Income:
In general, the greater one’s assets
at the time of retirement, the higher one’s
retirement income. The following two tables
provide the annual income stream made possible
from portfolios comprised of 50% Treasuries/50%
Equities and 50% Treasuries/50% Corporate
Bonds over investment terms[6] ranging from 30-40 years.
Upon one’s retirement, it is assumed
that the portfolios have been converted into
very low-risk securities. As a result, the
historic real rate of return on Treasuries
is employed during the annuity term[7]. Annuity terms ranging from 15-30 years are employed.
50% Treasuries/50% Equities:
Investment
Term |
30
Years |
35
Years |
40
Years |
Annuity
Term |
|
|
|
15
Years |
$5,983 |
$8,352 |
$11,532 |
20
Years |
$4,805 |
$6,707 |
$9,261 |
25
Years |
$4,108 |
$5,735 |
$7,918 |
30
Years |
$3,652 |
$5,099 |
$7,040 |
50% Treasuries/50% Corporate Bonds:
Investment
Term |
30
Years |
35
Years |
40
Years |
Annuity
Term |
|
|
|
15
Years |
$4,206 |
$5,399 |
$6,804 |
20
Years |
$3,377 |
$4,336 |
$5,464 |
25
Years |
$2,888 |
$3,707 |
$4,672 |
30
Years |
$2,677 |
$3,296 |
$4,154 |
Benefits of the RSA Concept:
The above concept offers several advantages
in that it is politically and fiscally viable
and personally and economically beneficial:
- It bridges the political divide concerning
partial pre-funding and offers a meaningful
opportunity to facilitate the partial pre-funding
of retirement in the very near-term.
- It offers powerful up-front and back-end
tax incentives to facilitate private retirement
saving.
- Given the compounding of investment returns,
tax revenue from distributions would exceed
that which would be foregone from the tax-deductibility
of RSA contributions.
- The RSA concept helps shore up the Social
Security Trust Fund with an additional
revenue stream that does not involve a
payroll tax increase.
- The RSA concept does not preclude Social
Security benefits reforms.
- To the extent that RSAs would increase
real national saving, they would help promote
increased long-run economic growth, elevated
productivity, and higher incomes.
Endnotes
[1] Estelle James, “Social
Security Reform Around the World: Lessons
from Other Countries,” National Center
for Policy Analysis, August 2002, p.2.
[2] A
March 10-13, 2005 ABC News/Washington Post
poll revealed that 56% of respondents supported
an option by which they “could invest
some of their Social Security contributions
in the stock market” while 41% opposed
it. A February 24-28, 2005 CBS News/New York
Times poll provided the opposite result with
43% supporting the ability of individuals
to invest part of their Social Security taxes
and 51% opposing it.
[3] Testimony
of Chairman Alan Greenspan before the President’s
Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform, March
3, 2005.
[4] Douglas
Holtz-Eakin, CBO Testimony before the Committee
on the Budget, U.S. House of Representatives,
February 9, 2005, p.7.
[5] The
SSA’s Office of the Chief Actuary estimated
nominal rates of return of 6.3% for Treasuries,
6.8% for corporate bonds, and 10% for equities.
The OMB uses a discount rate of 3.0% and
the CBO uses a discount rate of 3.3%.
[6] Investment
term: the amount of time over which a person
makes contributions to his/her RSA.
[7] Annuity
term: the period during which regular withdrawals
are made from the RSA, at the end of which
the RSA’s balance is brought to $0.00
|
|